Discussion @ 2158. Two progressions @ Timus Online Judge

Show all threads Hide all threads Show all messages Hide all messages
To Admin: Please update problem statement	Mickkie	2158. Two progressions	15 Sep 2023 00:50	2
To Admin: Please update problem statement Mickkie 14 Sep 2023 22:25 It's ambiguous to me at least whether you can change the order of the sequence or not. like {a3, a1, a5, a7}, {a6, a2, a4, a8} Re: To Admin: Please update problem statement Mickkie 15 Sep 2023 00:50 Read the problem again. Set is given. so ordering is not taken into account. However WA34 now :(
To admins: error in problem statement	Otrebus	2158. Two progressions	5 Sep 2023 04:25	2
To admins: error in problem statement Otrebus 3 Sep 2023 21:12 In the example outputs there's no third line containing the geometric progression like the problem states there should be. Re: To admins: error in problem statement Vladimir Yakovlev (USU) 5 Sep 2023 04:25 Fixed.
Why is newest problems can't reach to 0.001sec solution ? ))	coder	2158. Two progressions	5 Sep 2023 04:14	3
Why is newest problems can't reach to 0.001sec solution ? )) coder 2 Aug 2023 23:00 Re: Why is newest problems can't reach to 0.001sec solution ? )) try 25 Aug 2023 17:26 WA#29 ant hint for this tricky test case? I make lots of random cases but still no help :-( Re: Why is newest problems can't reach to 0.001sec solution ? )) Vladimir Yakovlev (USU) 5 Sep 2023 04:14 For this particular problem I think the input size matters. It allows getting 0.001 sec on every test after few retries. But it makes it hard to get 0.001 sec on all tests in a single try.

Style: flat | tree | nested
Thread Order: bubble | fixed

Discussion of Problem 2158. Two progressions