|
|
вернуться в форумSpaceology vs. Chronistics: I am stuck on test #55 My solution is like this: We find the paths of A && B. Definitely A && B will enter some circular path eventually. We assign to every junction(for A && B separately): 1. "pos" if this junction is traversed only once(before A || B enters his circular path) 2. "(pos,period)" if it appears in the circular path, where pos is the first occurrence of the junction,and period is the length of the circular path 3. "-1" if it is never visited Then for every junction we check whether its position(s) for A will meet B's. We may need to solve the equation: pos_A + period_A * x == pos_B + period_B * y where x,y >= 0 && the value on each side is minimum This can be done with euclid's method. However I am stuck on test#55. I have disposed all of my energy to find the tricky case but ended up with no result. Please help! Edited by author 23.04.2005 22:04 Re: Your algo is right Have you used int64 for the intermediate result? I suspect I've got some kind of overflow Thx Re: Your algo is right Послано Kit 24 апр 2005 19:55 Of course, there are may be very big numbers! if period_A = 99999, period_B = 99998 and pos_B - pos_A = 99997, we have almost 100000^2. Good luck! Yes, I made all calculations in int64 Re: Spaceology vs. Chronistics: I am stuck on test #55 I still can't pass #55 Now I suspect I made something wrong when solving pos_A + period_A * x == pos_B + period_B * y using euclid's method My method goes like this (short hands: pos_A: n1, pos_B: n2, period_A: a, period_B: b) So we want to solve n1 + ax == n2 + by, such that x, y >= 0 && n1 + ax is minimized if n1 >= n2, we just solve by - ax == n1 - n2, such that x, y >= 0 && x is minimum else ax - by == n2 - n1, such that x, y >= 0 && y is minimum Here's my code for solving ax - by == n, such that x, y >= 0 && y is minimum ( which equals to solve: by == a - n mod a (mod a) ) !! I am sorry for the readablility of the code since I don't know how to make the code look like indented. You can use my account 36057RJ to edit this msg and get indented code ################################ typedef typedef __int64 LL; LL Gcd(LL a, LL b, LL *x, LL *y) { if ( b == 0 ) { *x = 1; *y = 0; return a; } else { LL xx, yy; LL gcd = Gcd(b, a % b, &xx, &yy); *x = yy; *y = xx - (a / b) * yy; return gcd; } } LL SolveLinear(LL a, LL b, LL n) { LL result; LL x, y; LL q; LL d = Gcd(b, a, &x, &y); n = (a - n % a) % a; if ( n % d != 0 ) return -1; x *= n / d; q = a / d; result = x % q; if ( result < 0 ) result += q; return result; } #################################### Is this the right thing to do ? Thanks in advance for taking your time to check this Edited by author 26.04.2005 19:31 Interestingly, I got WA on 55 too. I'm checking it over now. I still can't pass it. I'm sure that I solved such equation correctly.... |
|
|