Discussion @ 1325. Dirt @ Timus Online Judge

Show all messages Hide all messages

wa on 16?what's wrong? boaz 7 Apr 2006 11:52

did anyone make the same mistake?
what's that?

Re: wa on 16?what's wrong? boaz 7 Apr 2006 17:12

o,i see now.

Re: wa on 16?what's wrong? edison 28 May 2006 13:44

Can you tell me?I got the WA on #16,too.Thank you.

Re: wa on 16?what's wrong? Samsonov Alex [USU] 28 Jul 2006 22:08

Yes, I have the same problem...

Re: wa on 16?what's wrong? AlexF [USTU] 1 Feb 2007 13:26

I had WA#16 because of the size of the queue.

Re: wa on 16?what's wrong? Izual 16 Mar 2007 17:55

Me too... When I tryed to change array size, I've got TLE#16, then I do a small optimization, and I've got TLE#16 again. I think used algo is incorrect. Use dijkstra+heap (easy to write) or double BFS (fast speed).

-----------------------------
Sorry for bad English

Edited by author 16.03.2007 17:56

Re: wa on 16?what's wrong? AlexF [USTU] 16 Mar 2007 19:33

I used double BFS and got AC)

Re: wa on 16?what's wrong? Roman Furko 20 Dec 2011 01:02

what mean double BFS?

Discussion of Problem 1325. Dirt