|
|
вернуться в форумPruning appeared to be very effective here. But I have a question (+) The statement "in the case of tie, you also have to minimize the number of rolls" is ambiguous. There might be a situation when using more rolls we can win (for instance) 1E-8 of distance. I had problems in understanding what should I do in such case and finally fell to EPS=1E-4 while updating the result. Is it correct or the tests are just weak?
P.S. I am learning C++, and I had a problem with pi. We have M_PI in BCC and VCC, but not in ICL. I had to declare "const double PI = 3.14159265358979323846" (extracted from math.h of VCC). Does anybody know what constant for pi is used in ICL?
Edited by author 26.04.2006 22:56 Re: PI I use
const double PI = 3.1415... Re: Pruning appeared to be very effective here. But I have a question (+) Послано c0der 28 апр 2006 21:51 const double Pi = acos(-1.0); Re: Pruning appeared to be very effective here. But I have a question (+)
#define USE_MATH_DEFS
#define _USE_MATH_DEFINES
#include <math.h>
const double PI = M_PI; Re: Pruning appeared to be very effective here. But I have a question (+) Послано svr 7 ноя 2009 10:33 I got Ac using convertion:
__int64 RRec=10000*(double)Rec;
if (RRec%10>4) RRec=RRec-RRec%10+10;
else RRec=RREc-RRec%10;
and
Rec=RREc;
Rec=Rec/10000;
But I am not sure that it so important |
|
|
