ENG  RUSTimus Online Judge
Online Judge
Задачи
Авторы
Соревнования
О системе
Часто задаваемые вопросы
Новости сайта
Форум
Ссылки
Архив задач
Отправить на проверку
Состояние проверки
Руководство
Регистрация
Исправить данные
Рейтинг авторов
Текущее соревнование
Расписание
Прошедшие соревнования
Правила
вернуться в форум

Обсуждение задачи 1527. Плохие дороги

What is test 10? WA!!!
Послано EfremovAleksei 1 мар 2007 22:25
Re: What is test 10? WA!!!
Послано Vedernikoff Sergey 2 мар 2007 11:58
There is definitely bug in checker. My correct solution gets WA #12, some other solutions with loops get WA #12, and got AC after deleting it (but my solution guarantees there is no loops). I think, we should wait while somebody will deign to fix this bug in checker.
But such problems arise only with test #12. If you have WA #10, may be there is problem with your code...
Re: What is test 10? WA!!!
Послано Kit 2 мар 2007 14:10
From your words I can conclude what though your solution doesn't output any loops, It has some other bugs :) Leave you mail, may be I can help you.
Re: What is test 10? WA!!!
Послано Vedernikoff Sergey 2 мар 2007 17:00
VedernikoffSM[at]mail[dot]ru
Re: What is test 10? WA!!!
Послано svr 28 июл 2007 10:55
How did you understand specifics of test 10?
Help, please.
Re: What is test 10? WA!!!
Послано Denis Koshman 13 июл 2008 23:58
I had problems with WA#9 and WA#10 due to bugs in my code, nothing conceptual. My solution considers loops, but the way it selects path for the answer, it will never attempt to backtrace a loopy one.

Edited by author 13.07.2008 23:58
Re: What is test 10? WA!!!
Послано 107th 15 июл 2008 18:04
If you have WA 10: "roads are unidirectional" means that roads are one-way ))
Re: What is test 10? WA!!!
Послано Eldar Bogdanov 18 июл 2008 05:29
I also have WA12, I have submitted code which should produce a runtime error if there is a loop and it just WAd. Could anybody give me any clue?
Test 12 problem
Послано Eldar Bogdanov 20 июл 2008 12:59
Accepted.
If anybody's interested, my mistake was stopping the Dijkstra when it came across an already found node. It could be that distance to T is even more but still acceptable.

Edited by author 24.07.2008 16:29