|
|
вернуться в форумWhy WA on 4 test? SPS This code dont worked! Why? I dont know what i should to change. type TPoint = record X, Y: Extended; end; var N, R: integer; Points: array of TPoint; Sum: Extended; function GetR(Index: integer): Extended; begin Result := sqrt( sqr(Points[Index].X - Points[Index + 1].X) + sqr(Points[Index].Y - Points[Index + 1].Y)); end; var i: integer; begin Readln(N, R); SetLength(Points, N + 1); for i := 0 to N - 1 do with Points[i] do Readln(X, Y); Points[N] := Points[0]; // зацикл Sum := 2*pi*R; for i := 0 to N - 1 do Sum := Sum + GetR(i); Writeln(Sum:0:2); end. Thanks; Why WA on 4 test? SPS I think that following formula correct: Sum := 2*pi*R + R(1, 2) + R(2, 3) + ... + R(N - 1, N) + R(N, 0) ; Where R(i, j) - is function which returns distance between i and j nail's. Where i'm wrong? Edited by author 21.08.2008 13:57 Edited by author 21.08.2008 13:57 Why WA on 4 test? SPS Anybody, give me please same test's Re: Why WA on 4 test? SPS OOOOOOoo :). My solution is correct. :0 My bug was here .... R: integer; .... but should be float type. unattentive Re: Why WA on 4 test? SPS Послано Dmitry 18 фев 2009 18:27 thanks, my error was the same :) Re: Why WA on 4 test? SPS Послано akoskm 18 окт 2009 16:02 me too :D thank you! Re: Why WA on 4 test? Please help ! //81674XO #include <iostream> #include <cmath> using namespace std; int main(){ double PI=acos(-1.0); int N; double r, perimeter; cin>>N>>r; double *pointx, *pointy; pointx = new double[N+1]; pointy = new double[N+1]; for(int a=0; a<N; a++){ cin>>pointx[a]>>pointy[a]; } pointy[N]= pointx[0]; pointx[N] = pointy[0]; cout.setf(ios::fixed); cout.setf(ios::showpoint); cout.precision(2); if(N==1){ perimeter=2*PI*r; cout<<perimeter;
} else{ if(N==2){ perimeter=2*(pow((pow((pointx[0]-pointx[1]),2)+pow((pointy[0]-pointy[1]),2)),0.5)) + 2*PI*r; cout<<perimeter;
} else{ double angle; for(int a=0; a<N; a++){ perimeter += pow((pow((pointx[a]-pointx[a+1]),2)+pow((pointy[a]-pointy[a+1]),2)),0.5); }
double p1x, p2x, p3x, p1y, p2y, p3y, m1, m2;
p1x=pointx[N-1]; p2x=pointx[0]; p3x=pointx[1]; p1y=pointy[N-1]; p2y=pointy[0]; p3y=pointy[1]; if(p3x==p2x) m1=tan(PI/2.0); if(p2x==p1x) m2=tan(PI/2.0); if(p2x!=p3x) m1=(p3y-p2y)/(p3x-p2x); if(p2x!=p1x) m2=(p1y-p2y)/(p1x-p2x); angle = 2*PI - (PI + fabs(atan(m1)-atan(m2))); for(int a=1; a<N; a++){ p1x=pointx[a-1]; p2x=pointx[a]; p3x=pointx[a+1]; p1y=pointy[a-1]; p2y=pointy[a]; p3y=pointy[a+1]; if(p3x==p2x) m1=tan(PI/2.0); if(p2x==p1x) m2=tan(PI/2.0); if(p2x!=p3x) m1=(p3y-p2y)/(p3x-p2x); if(p2x!=p1x) m2=(p1y-p2y)/(p1x-p2x);
angle += 2*PI - (PI + fabs(atan(m1)-atan(m2))); }
perimeter += r*angle; cout<<perimeter; }} return 0;}
// please run my program and also, for some test cases and check for difference in answers !! I've got WA#3. Why? program project1; var n, i : shortint; r, res, x, y, x1, y1, x0, y0 : extended; begin readln(n, r); readln(x, y); x0:=x; y0:=y; res:=2*pi*r; for i:=1 to n-1 do begin readln(x1, y1); res:=res+sqrt(sqr(x1-x)+sqr(y1-y)); y:=y1; x:=x1; end; write((res+sqrt(sqr(x1-x0)+sqr(y1-y0))):1:2); end. Re: Why WA on 4 test? Please help ! Послано WOVVAN 2 фев 2010 01:00 pizdos u teb9 proga)) 9 dumau 4to delo nemnogo v kode) |
|
|