|
|
back to boardNothing here (-) Edited by author 29.10.2008 10:05 Re: Nothing here (-) Posted by svr 29 Oct 2008 21:54 You are mistaken removing your message. I think that the problem is difficult, many solvers used random searh and brute forse and with n->1000 number of have solved will -> 10-30 So talk about algo was helpfull. Re: Nothing here (-) I don't think this task will be that difficult... I do it in o ( n ^ 2 ) and it's not that hard and i thing i can do it n logn with some optimizations... |
|
|