|  | 
|  | 
| вернуться в форум | Very Very Bad Task Description Послано Laise  23 янв 2009 01:27words "... and array A was filled with a nondescending integer sequence." means another that author want to say.
 E.g. nondescending array consists of only values 666, so which N can give us result (i=666,L=1)? of course all possible 1..MAXN =) but my AC prog output 1333-1334 =\... very very strange, don't you mind?
Re: Very Very Bad Task Description Послано ile  13 май 2010 02:52True. The problem statement is wrong!!
 Solution requires array A to be { 1, 2, 3, ... } which is not "... and array A was filled with a nondescending integer sequence.". That could mean ANY NON-DESCENDING sequence, i.e. A could be { 1, 1, 1, 10, 12, 13 ...} which is completely different problem!
Re: Very Very Bad Task Description You are wrong. You are given only i and L in this problem, x is unknown. So array shouldn't be { 1, 2, 3, ... }, any nondescending array is OK.Re: Very Very Bad Task Description Послано ile  20 май 2010 01:42Ok, I might be wrong. But what do you think is the answer for input like: 666 1?
 Aren't ALL integers in [1, 10000] are possible answers??
 array might be { 666, 666, 666, 666 ... } which does not contradict problem statement, yet any size of N in [1, 10000] will give
 
 "Found item i = 666 in L = 1 comparisons"
 
 right? meaning answer should be "1 1 10000" and not "1 1333 1334"...
Re: Very Very Bad Task Description If N = 10000 and array is { 666, 666, 666, 666 ... } then output of the program will be "Found item i = 5000 in L = 1 comparisons". Read the program code carefully.Re: Very Very Bad Task Description Послано ile  20 май 2010 03:52I apologize. My bad. Misunderstood the problem statement... "item i" kinda misleads... | 
 | 
|