Обсуждение @ 1688. Team.GOV! @ Timus Online Judge

WA 11

Послано an100000 28 фев 2009 14:33

What is wrong with this test?

Re: WA 11

Послано Le Do Hoang Nam 28 фев 2009 14:45

use s > 3*n instead of s / 3 > n

Re: WA 11

Послано fR0D 28 фев 2009 14:58

whats wrong with this program?
Got AC using __int64 instead of long long.
Anybody willing to explain why?
Whats the difference between __int64 and long long?

Edited by author 28.02.2009 15:59

Re: WA 11

Послано an100000 28 фев 2009 15:13

But if i use it i have wa 10

Re: WA 11

Послано BVitaly 28 фев 2009 15:24

Wrong Answer 2
in my pascal code and in this /\ /\ /\ C code

Re: WA 11

Послано Le Do Hoang Nam 28 фев 2009 15:48

because s can be greater than max(long long). Use int64 instead.

Re: WA 11

Послано fR0D 28 фев 2009 16:03

But the maximum value of s can be 3000*2*10^6 which is well within the range of long long?

Re: WA 11

Послано Monyura 28 фев 2009 16:20

I use int64 and s>n*3 but have WA10, what's wrong with this program?

Re: WA 11

Послано zsyzhbc_china 5 янв 2010 10:47

me too

Re: WA 11

Послано Tural Neymanov 12 мар 2010 00:23

maybe you should use qword instead of int64 as i did? do not forget to make them both qword and multiply first by three rather than dividing another one.

Re: WA 11

Послано bigtik 19 окт 2011 04:50

use long... something biger than int is needed.

Re: WA 11

Послано Artem Fast 11 фев 2012 20:05

u can use unsigned long long and get AC

Обсуждение задачи 1688. Team.GOV!