|
|
back to boardn=1500 seems to big.. Posted by svr 18 Oct 2009 12:37 After sorting we have the problem of finding maximal-sum submatrix but it has O(n^3). After additional thinking- all OK! This is the way.For eaach row range [i1,i2] it should mantain set of nonzero columns and number of such colums in mean must be 1-10 Pardon...Tle. Instead 1-10 really we have 500 Edited by author 19.10.2009 20:45 Re: n=1500 seems to big.. Max-sum submatrix problem has O(N^2 log n) complexity As I heard, it is enough for this problem Re: n=1500 seems to big.. How? I only know how to solve Max-sum submatrix problem with O(n) non-zero elements with this asymptotic Re: n=1500 seems to big.. (deleted) Edited by author 29.10.2009 04:19 Re: n=1500 seems to big.. OK, I see my mistake now :o) N is number of non-zero elements, not the side of the matrix :o) |
|
|