|
|
back to boardShow all messages Hide all messagesWA #5 coders1122 28 Oct 2010 20:09 see the second sample on your site. the answer is 2. Any suggestions on improvement of the algorithm i use? Is my approach wrong or can be fine with some tweaking? Ravi Kiran. If in your current state s1[i]==s2[j], you should not assume states i+1,j and i,j+1. Only i+1,j+1. Thanks a lot everyone. I got accepted with the change you suggested. |
|
|