Discussion @ 1871. Seismic Waves @ Timus Online Judge

2 Admins: what's wrong with checker ? Strekalovsky Oleg [Vologda SPU #1] 30 Oct 2011 18:49

Why my solution ID=3932185, ID=3932184 get's WA against crash ?
In my source code i have thrown an Error, but program not crashed ,but get WA 1.

If you create new Thread, throwing an exception will lead to WA: another Thread outputs nothing and finishes its work correctly

Re: 2 Admins: what's wrong with checker ? Strekalovsky Oleg [Vologda SPU #1] 31 Oct 2011 00:21

Noob wrote 30 October 2011 23:13

If you create new Thread, throwing an exception will lead to WA: another Thread outputs nothing and finishes its work correctly

Are you sure, that after >480 accepted solutions I'v done so stupid mistake ?
PS:
I don't use threads. Problem was with Timus JVM. It's solved.

Anyway, if you throw an exception or write System.exit(-1) in a newly created Thread, you will get WA, not RE. It's that I don't like on Timus.

Re: 2 Admins: what's wrong with checker ? Strekalovsky Oleg [Vologda SPU #1] 31 Oct 2011 12:12

Noob wrote 31 October 2011 00:26

Anyway, if you throw an exception or write System.exit(-1) in a newly created Thread, you will get WA, not RE. It's that I don't like on Timus.

I know that. I don't use threads.

Re: 2 Admins: what's wrong with checker ? Vladimir Yakovlev (USU) 31 Oct 2011 13:26

These sumbissions have verdict Crash 1 now. It was a failure of compiler - any solution was judged as WA1.

Discussion of Problem 1871. Seismic Waves