|
|
back to boardDidnt understand the question clearly 1) What does it mean by two-way road? Lets say I use road 1 and 3 in the sample.. To go from 1 to 3, it costs 300 and from 3 to 1 it is just 10. In that case we dont have route to go from 5 to 3. Then why is the answer correct? 1 3 5 2 1 to 3 -> 300 3 to 5 -> (No route, but taking 5 to 3 value) 300 + 20 5 to 2 -> (Again no route, taking 2 to 5 value) 300 + 20 + 15 2 to 1 -> (No route, using 1 to 2) 300 + 20 + 15 + 16 => 351 But consider 1 2 5 3 1 to 2 -> 16 2 to 5 -> 16 + 15 5 to 3 -> 16 + 15 + 20 3 to 1 -> 16 + 15 + 20 + 10 which is just 61 Could someone please explain why it is 1 3 5 2 and not 1 2 5 3? Re: Didnt understand the question clearly Posted by 2rf 24 Mar 2012 16:15 Both answers are correct. In first sample there are 2 two-way roads between crossings 1 and 3: one's length is 300 and the other's is 10. Of course, in optimal solution you will only use shortest road between some pair of crossings. Re: Didnt understand the question clearly Re: Didnt understand the question clearly Posted by 2rf 25 Mar 2012 00:40 This test is clearly incorrect: 4th line describes an edge connecting vertices 1 and 40. However, there are only vertices with numbers from 1 to 4. Most probably, 4th line should be "1 4 60". "2 3 4" is correct answer then. |
|
|