|
|
back to boardShow all messages Hide all messagesWA#4 QWERTY 20 Oct 2012 14:07 the problem seems to be very easy but idk, i have WA#4 too Same for me, fails at 4. Please double check. Re: WA#4 ...†.†.†... Stigius ...†.†.†... 20 Oct 2012 15:38 There are many fails on test 4. But it is absolutely correct, both test and answer were checked by hands multiple times. Look for error in your code. Re: WA#4 SPb SU Taken: Demidov, Korystov 20 Oct 2012 16:24 Does cylinder contains bottom and top? > Does cylinder contains bottom and top?
Take a look at the sample inputs again. Re: WA#4 Oracle[Lviv NU] 21 Oct 2012 21:25 I've checked my formula with both kinds of formulas given in this article: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2691523?uid=3739232&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21101178420913 (if someone is interested in full version of article - mailto Oracle@acm.lviv.ua) I use BigInteger in Java - should be no precision issues. Results are the same for all rectangles with 1 <= sides <= 100 and for about a billion random test cases with 1 <= side <= 1000000. And still WA#4((( Is it definitely correct? Now I wonder if the problem is exactly in checking if one rectangle fits into others? Or I've missed something? Re: WA#4 Oracle[Lviv NU] 22 Oct 2012 02:20 Sorry for complaint. Seems that tests are correct - I've misunderstood the statement. |
|
|
