ENG  RUSTimus Online Judge
Online Judge
Задачи
Авторы
Соревнования
О системе
Часто задаваемые вопросы
Новости сайта
Форум
Ссылки
Архив задач
Отправить на проверку
Состояние проверки
Руководство
Регистрация
Исправить данные
Рейтинг авторов
Текущее соревнование
Расписание
Прошедшие соревнования
Правила
вернуться в форум

Обсуждение задачи 2018. Дебютный альбом

Nikita Mogilevets Is "1513.Lemon Tale" the same problem? [6] // Задача 2018. Дебютный альбом 14 май 2017 00:46
http://acm.timus.ru/problem.aspx?space=1&num=1513
It seems that those are the same problem.  In 1513,  just b=INF.
But that problem is of rating of 100, and Lemon Tale is of rating of around 500.
Nikita Mogilevets Re: Is "1513.Lemon Tale" the same problem? [3] // Задача 2018. Дебютный альбом 21 май 2017 10:51
Yes,  Lemon Tale is just the same problem.  Even easier problem.
Nikita Mogilevets Re: Is "1513.Lemon Tale" the same problem? [2] // Задача 2018. Дебютный альбом 21 май 2017 10:51
Problem rating lies heavily : 106 vs 400.
Grandmaster Re: Is "1513.Lemon Tale" the same problem? [1] // Задача 2018. Дебютный альбом 11 авг 2017 01:11
well it is true that this problem is harder in concept but that problem i think is just harder to implement in competition unless you use javabiginteger, but in c++ u must implement addition and diference with biginteger, and this problem is just done in about 10 lines of straight code
Nikita Mogilevets Re: Is "1513.Lemon Tale" the same problem? // Задача 2018. Дебютный альбом 11 авг 2017 09:02
There exists four or five lines python solution using only python lists
mouse_wireless2 Re: Is "1513.Lemon Tale" the same problem? // Задача 2018. Дебютный альбом 18 янв 2018 03:42
1513 has tighter limits though
For this problem, you can implement a dp in O(n * (a + b)) but in Lemon Tale you can't
Anatoliy V Tomilov Re: Is "1513.Lemon Tale" the same problem? // Задача 2018. Дебютный альбом 18 янв 2018 11:26
There are another similar problems, where rank lies. Say, 1285 is formally harder, then 1075. But if one have already solved 1075, then, probably, one may need to change just single dimensionality constant from 3 to 8 to get solution of 1285. Rate of ACs should be slightly less for harder, but latter problem, for sure.

Another factor is the optimistic one: people are getting smarter and smarter on an average. New problems are solved by less efforts. The technological singularity is coming!

Edited by author 18.01.2018 11:30