|
|
back to boardAbout Problem 1018 > but for this test my program show 60 (i thing that 70 is > OK) > 5 2 > 1 2 10 > 2 3 50 > 1 4 30 > 4 5 40 THIS is a VERY GOOD example, showing that greedy algorithm is not working! Tests updated, problem unlocked. Thank you all for support and espexially toPavel Aksonov. And all submits are redjudged Re: please note!! > > 5 2 > > 1 2 10 > > 2 3 50 > > 1 4 30 > > 4 5 40 > > THIS is a VERY GOOD example, showing that greedy algorithm > is not working! > > Tests updated, problem unlocked. The quote from the problem definition: "...You're right, it looks just like a binary tree, i.e. any biparous branch splits up to exactly two new branches." But the given tree's branches 1-2 and 1-4 DO NOT split into two new branches, thus it CAN NOT occur in the tests! You are right, thank you. But i made a correct test. |
|
|