|
|
back to board1003- Why just 2 seconds? Posted by Ksenya 29 Dec 2003 22:08 I think 2 seconds is bad Time Limit. Also I don't know how many input tests contains each test. So I tried everything: like binary search and hash-function. But always TLE. Do you think 2 seconds is enough time? Re: 1003- Why just 2 seconds? Posted by buggzy 28 Mar 2004 22:05 There is at least O(n*n) algorithm for 1003. Re: 1003- Why just 2 seconds? I solved it in O(n*n) time and get AC in 0.125 sec. So, 2 seconds is enough timelimit for this problem. Re: 1003- Why just 2 seconds? Posted by buggzy 29 Mar 2004 10:53 My algo is: Each point have attibutes "parity" and "connectivity compontent number". When processing each segment, we check if it - form a new connectivity component - O(1) - extends existing connectivity components - O(1) - connects existing CCs - O(N) for glue operation - form a cycle in the existing CC - O(1) This stage is O(n*n). It's quite enought for AC, but I'm still interested in more efficient algorithm :) Any ideas? :) |
|
|